In which scenario should the term 'ENGAGE' not be utilized?

The term 'ENGAGE' is typically reserved for situations where direct engagement with a target is appropriate. In the context of Terminal Attack Control Type I or II Close Air Support (CAS) engagements, the term is not utilized in its command form because the focus is on ensuring the aircraft and ground assets have the proper identification, deconfliction, and authorization to employ weapons. The engagement process in Type I and II requires highly specific coordination and control to mitigate friendly fire risks and to ensure effective strikes on identified targets.

In contrast, in scenarios like coordinated air strikes, ground assaults, and aerial reconnaissance, the term 'ENGAGE' may be applicable as it directly refers to the action of targeting and attacking. In these situations, clarity and authority are critical, and using the term correctly aligns with established military communication protocols.